CounterTruth.com - Counter Truth

.

10/27/2017

2017 - U.S. State Department Says Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) Were Used To Attack Americans

In August, 2017, the U.S. State Department acknowledged that Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) were likely used against American Embassy personnel in Havana Cuba. In a world climate where chaotic events are seemingly unfolding on a daily basis, it is most unfortunate that this story will likely be over-shadowed and overlooked. Unfortunate, because this is a rather ground-breaking event that we've not seen the likes of since the 1970's discovery of Microwave Weapons being used against U.S. Embassy personnel in Moscow This is a crucial event because it shows that the use of Directed Energy Weapons is not just the stuff of conspiracy theory or Science-Fiction. The use of Directed Energy against people is real and has been for more than three quarters of a century. From reports, it appears that these attacks had been occurring for some time before they were discovered and reported. This is an important observation because it shows that a state actor (Cuba) with relatively primitive technological capabilities, comparative to that of the U.S., can still carry out a covert attack with some degree of success, using Directed Energy Weapons. Successful, from a perpetrator's perspective, because the targeted U.S. personnel were physically harmed all while there is no smoking gun for which the U.S. government can explicitly use for reprimand. Directed Energy Weapons are a perfect weapon because you can not hear, see, smell, taste or even feel (in some cases) their presence, so there is great difficulty in proving that the weapon has been used in the commission of a crime.

There are few details about this incident which is not surprising, but what is surprising or even unbelievable, is the fact that the State Department would even publicly acknowledge that an incident involving Directed Energy Weapons actually occurred. This is unbelievable because DEW's are such a powerful tool for governments and militaries, and their usage is kept veiled because of the public fear and suspicion that can arise if usage is openly known or acknowledged.

Directed Energy should be seen as one of the most ominous technologies that mankind can harness. In time, people will begin to discover the vast capabilities that directed energy can hold over mankind. It can heal or kill, pacify or insight ! Those "New Age" hippies from the 1970's don't look so "spacey" to me nowadays. Energy is the essence of life, but what so many of us have always overlooked is the power and effects of the free-flowing electromagnetic energy all around us. And, the effects of this energy can be profound, depending on the frequencies and power levels. Let's reference something that provides us a little more perspective: Radioactive or Nuclear Energy. The world was introduced to the effects of this energy via Hiroshima and Nagasaki, at the closing of WWII. Beyond the blast potential of the energy, there is standing radioactive energy present that is very powerful and dangerous. You don't see, hear, feel or smell this energy. You can detect it with a Geiger Counter, but you don't "sense" its presence --- until it's too late. To some extent, depending on frequencies and power levels, the same can be said for other types of radio energies. They are all around us, like Wi-Fi, but you don't sense it.

Very specific radio frequencies can affect or direct biological processes in an organism. Fact. These affects on bioelectric processes can either heal or kill an organism and it can all be done through the power of Directed Energy (radio frequencies). Most people think only of the human body as being a biochemical system and they overlook the fact that the body is a bioelectric system, as well. The influences of electromagnetic energy upon biology can be profound and is an area of intense, ongoing scientific study.

Just as the human genome (genetic blueprint of our biological structure) has been mapped, our biological energy frequencies are being mapped, as well ! With a library of biological frequencies available, the capabilities of using Directed Energy frequencies on an organism are theoretically boundless. Directed Energy Weapons can zap and explode things, but we already have bombs that can do that. The real power of Directed Energy can be seen through its potential to dictate biological processes, redirect human thought processes, and Decipher human thoughts through the capture and subsequent processing of electrical frequencies of the brain (via antennae and software). Directed Energy can affect motor, metabolic and inflammation responses. So yes, it can can either heal or kill. When I think of the sinister capabilities that this technology possesses, I get a flashback to the 'mind lock' as seen in George Lucas' pre-Star Wars movie, "THX 1138." But, people this is science ; it is not wholly fiction.

The events that unfolded in Havana gives testimony to the power of DEWs by showing that even lower-tier states are utilizing this technology to an extent that they have enough confidence in the technology to use its capabilities against a top-tier nation. And, if the most developed nation on Earth can not definitively identify and criminalize the use of Directed Energy at a Havana embassy, how on Earth are Joe and Jane Activist going to fare when they claim that they are victims of Electronic Harassment ?

The power of Directed Energy upon biology is one which man should never harness, for the "natural" world experience of man could cease to exist.

-------------------------
"US diplomats, families in Cuba targeted nearly 50 times by sonic attacks, says US official"
By Patrick Oppmann and Elise Labott
Updated 4:36 PM ET, Sat September 23, 2017
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/23/politics/cuba-sonic-attack/index.html

"U.S. Diplomats in Cuba Were Injured by a 'Sonic Weapon.' What Is That?"
Kate Samuelson,Justin Worland
Aug 10, 2017
http://time.com/4895066/sonic-weapons-cuba/

"Was Cuban sonic attack a weapon, or an accident?"
By Nicole Gaouette, Michelle Kosinski and Laura Koran, CNN
Updated 10:28 AM ET, Fri August 25, 2017
http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/24/politics/cuba-sonic-attack-questions/index.html

.

7/28/2017

Grooming In The Shadows

An attack at the 2015 “Draw Muhammed” art contest in Garland, Texas by Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi revealed that an undercover FBI agent had been tracking Simpson and Soofi right up to the very exact moment that they carried out the attack. In fact, police stopped and detained the undercover FBI Agent as he tried to drive away from the shooting scene. Just weeks before the shooting this FBI undercover agent, who was posing as an Islamic radical, was found to have exchanged text messages with Elton Simpson that encouraged him to “Tear up Texas.” What isn't known is whether the FBI were using directed energy pyschotronics or SIGINT on Simpson, along with the documented social grooming techniques that were seen in the text messages exchanged between the two parties.

This is a prime example of how Law Enforcement, Intel Agencies and the Military covertly manipulate people in sinister ways. Simpson may have been a person with malintent or he could have just been someone who was disenchanted by the political climate. If he was the latter, he may have carried on like most other people and never would have acted out on his discontent. But, with a little prodding, incitement and some psy-ops thrown in, it may have sent him over the edge.

Most mainstream media outlets don't air provacative stories involving law enforcement corruption, because the media is in the pocket of authorities, so most citizens are unaware that this type of stuff occurs much more often than one would imagine.

The Psy-Ops and Directed Energy tools that intelligence agencies, LEIU's and the military have at their disposal are being misused and citizens' civil and human rights are being abused.

The government is not your friend. It's composed of many people using your hard-earned tax dollars to satiate their own interests and agendas. A good handful of these "public servants" are likely clinical sociopaths who seek politics as a means to attain power that stokes their egos, fuels their narcicism and provides a podium to air their delusional grandeur. This can be equally said for "some" who seek employ in the Law Enforcement, Intelligence Agency and Military communities. The remaining bureacratic servants find government jobs as a tenure for benefits and pensions, while implementing doctrine prescribed by those in elevated positions of swell-headed power. All the while, the system is peddled onward with programs and operations that aren't always in the best interests of the people. These guys aren't rock stars, innovators or anything close to "cool." They are egoists, followers and tax dollar moochers.

Law Enforcement, Intelligence Agencies and the Military do plenty of bad shit to people that often goes completely unseen. So, the next time the media reports on a supposed hero being struck down in the line of duty, don't fall for all the pomp and condolence that the media spews. Call it Karma.

.

7/26/2017

The Cycle of Harassment

Within about a year of launching this website, many of the harassment techniques that I've reported here began to wane.

One notable detail is the Sheriff's Department. I virtually never saw a Sheriff in my city before the harassment began, but once it started, I came across a Sheriff's vehicle behind me, parked near my home or flashing their lights behind me, on a weekly basis. These instances occurred around 2013 to 2016. Once I started aggressively pairing my website and social media, the Sheriff's Department's pressence began to dissipate. I have not seen a Sheriff's vehicle in about a year now. To a much lesser extent, the same could be said about the SAPD. All of the usually "marked" vehicles that were always seen around my location slowly faded away. Odd situations occuring around my home ended. The home entries stopped, most likely because of the security steps I've implemented, of which are openly detailed on the Security page of this site. So, what has not changed? The SIGINT and Directed Energy I witness has increased many fold, though steps for mitigating this can be found on the Sheilding page of this site. Additional harassment details that occasiaonally remain mostly involve tampering with my vehicle.

Aggressive confrontation, Security measures and Shielding are the keys to suppressing these harassment campaigns. Is it coincidence that most of the problems I was witnessing virtually ceased once I started to aggressively voice my concerns and implement Security and electromagnetic Shielding measures ? The electronic harrassment remains because there's no easy way for people to prove that directed radio signals are being used as a weapon. See the Security & Shielding pages of CounterTruth.com and note the highlighted points of advice that are given, for I believe that the effectiveness I've found in these measures may be invaluable to others!

3/4/2017

In Retrospect . . .

I've pondered over a couple instances from the past of which I believe may be pertinent to my situation as a target of surveillance and SIGINT Directed Energy.

I pulled a gun on an undercover officer around 2001 at my residence. The officer, who had a scraggly "street" appearance, knocked on my door on a weeknight. Not being sure of the officer's credentials as being an undercover detective, I held a handgun, out of site and behind my back, as the officer started asking odd questions about a person living near my home whom was supposedly under investigation for drug dealing. The description of the individual did not meet that of anyone living near me, and I knew the area well ! I also found it odd that he would approach me about a neighbor that wasn't even that close to my location. The officer proceeded to aggressively ask me what I was holding behind my back, while I was standing within my doorway. At that point I shut the door and loudly chambered the pistol. The detective backed away from the front door and proceeded to state that I should open the door. I then proceeded to call the non-emergency phone number of the SAPD where I stated that an officer should be dispatched to verify the detectives credentials. Things were cleared-up once a uniformed officer arrived. The agent left without many words spoken and I did not persue lengthening any exchange, but to this day, I do not know who the agent represented. Whether it was SAPD or SAFBI, I will never know, but having this knowledge today would make a world of difference in my quest for Justice.

Right around the same time as the instance above, I got pulled over by a police officer for a vehicular moving violation. The officer sat in his car for almost 20 minutes after acquiring my license and registration. I asked the officer what the hold-up was, and he proceeded to tell me that there was a name on an offender's list that was exactly like mine, down to the middle initial. He said that he eventually found that, although the middle initials were the same, the middle name was different than mine. If this took a seasoned police officer almost half an hour to determine that I was not the same individual who was on this Offender's List, then what are the odds that some lazy person with access to this Offenders List is going to make an effort to verify that I'm Not That Person ?

It was right around this same time-frame that these law enforcment encounters occurred when I first experienced a few weird situations that, in retrospect, were definitely the beginnings of Electronic Harassment and surreptitious home entries. Some of these instances involved some effects from directed energy, which I can now attest to. I didn't know what these effects were attributed to at that time, but they were really odd considering my good health and no apparent health problems. They were sporadic and fleeting, unlike the clockwork persistence I see nowadays. These early instances may have been fact-finding expeditions or SIGINT investigations. People's nervous systems function at slightly different impulse frequencies from eachother. These weird instances may have been the early stages of impulse fingerprinting (aka, brain mapping) in preparation for future harassment and monitoring. Perhaps?

Beyond these instances, I was known to be outspoken about big government infringements on people's liberties. As well, I am eccentric, traveled, educated and capable in a diverse range of intellectual and physical genres. I have no criminal records beyond vehicle violations. On top of this, I'm very reclusive and private and I apply physical and technological security measures. These traits may very well have begged interest and inquiry into my inner workings. But, it doesn't justify it.

People from the outside often ask why someone would be targeted and whether it is really real or just some craziness. Well, many people, I believe, who are being targeted by these illegal surveillance campaigns have simply pissed off law enforcment or authorities. Some targets may be the result of revenge by an acquaintance in government. Others may be targeted through bonafide investigations into potential community threats. Some targets may even be part of experimentation or the result of agents "playing around" with technology. But, no targeting is ethical or legal under the constitution. The technology is not that exotic --- it has been around for decades --- it's only radio signals, like that of your cell phone. And, yes, this is really happening !

7/10/2016

Militarizing The Police

An unprecedented Act of War has been unleashed upon the American people. Literally, an Act of War, in the sense that a tactical technique that has only previously seen deployment on battlefields has now been deployed against a citizen on the streets of America.

Let's explore how we got to this point.

On July 5th and 6th, 2016, two separate incidents involving the fatal shootings of black civilians by white police officers were captured on video in Baton Rouge and Minneapolis-St. Paul. Preliminary information and video footage of these events evoked civilian protests throughout cities across the nation where, on July 7th, six Dallas Police Officers were fatally shot by a black sniper who voiced anger over the mounting police shootings of black men.

The events that unfolded on the streets of Baton Rouge, Minneapolis-St. Paul and Dallas culminated in a singular crucial event that has been overlooked by some and which may have grave consequences for our future. Witness the emergence of the UGV Drone Strike.

The UGV Drone (Unmanned Ground Vehicle) is a remotely controlled robotic ground vehicle that can serve purposes such as reconnaissance or as a lethal delivery system. These devices have seen extensive use in the Iraqi and Afghan arenas. It differs from the UAV Drones (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) that we are most familiar with in that it's restricted to ground-based operations. The adoption of tactical devices such as this follows course with the increasing militarization of police departments across the country.

The militarization of police departments can, in many regards, be traced back to nearly three quarters of a century of meddling in the Middle-East, with pronounced effects coming from the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions. The events of 9/11, global terrorism and the rise of the Islamic State Army are all effects of this meddling. The War On Terror has done more to promote the creation of terrorists than any other measure. The War On Terror "Policy" dictates that we annihilate terrorists, and in doing so, civilian collateral damage occurs which, in turn, conceives more resentment and hate from new generations who then become fervent terrorists (or freedom fighters, in their perspective). This "policy" is then doubled-down and the vicious cycle continues. The cycle of violence continues to the point where it threatens the homeland, whereby heavy-handed legislation produces the likes of the Patriot Act, and the Department of Homeland Security.

And, the war machine continues to churn, creating more turmoil and most importantly, the spoils of war --- profit in the form of advantageous mineral-land-grabs, military base installations and lucrative contracts for big corporations within the military-industrial complex.

Through all of this, our nation has witnessed a paradigm shift where militaristic approaches from the battlefields are projected upon the police departments of our cities. We are seeing federal military surpluses being made available to domestic police departments, which increasingly resemble that of National Guard forces rather than that of a civil policing departments. We see camouflage tactical gear being donned, tricked-out assault rifles, signals intelligence (SIGINT), surveillance equipment, directed-energy-crowd-control equipment and militaristic personnel carriers emerging from our local precincts. And, on a cerebral note, one has to ask whether this increasing militaristic atmosphere is having any psychological effect on police by lending a sense of emboldening or bravado which could potentially influence the way they interact with citizens or suspects on the streets ?

A profound, watershed moment was witnessed in Dallas, one which may have opened the gate to a future where many more lives and civil liberties may hang in the balance. This pivotal event involved the use of a UGV Drone ( similar to a PackBot ) that was used to deliver and detonate a C4 explosive at the combatant's location. Boom ! Wow, the government uses suicide bombers too, albeit mechanical in form ! This is unprecedented. Reports of similar tactics have been stated to have occurred in Iraq and Afghanistan, but those were war zones.

This poses the question of just how far the government can escalate force against an American citizen on American soil.

The US has been producing frag grenades since WWII, but have our laws ever allowed police to lob a lethal frag grenade through the window of a building where an armed standoff has occurred? No ! So, is a UVG Drone any different ? No ! Just because it is a non-human robotic device does not detract from the fact that a life is being taken by means of an escalated offensive tactic which has historically been reserved for the battlefield.

This brazen use of a UGV Drone is mind boggling. You would think that authorities would have learned from the perils of the 1993 Waco incident, where armored Tanks (not their munitions) and incendiary devices were utilized, and the lives of many women and children were lost while the wrath of Timothy McVeigh was spawned.

My simple understanding has always been, that the use of lethal force is only viable if opposing deadly force is either exhibited or attempted. If an antagonist exhibits deadly force and then drops their weapon, then there are no longer grounds for use of deadly force against the actor, unless repossession of the weapon is attempted. Thus far, the preliminary evidence from Dallas doesn't exhibit such a scenario and it more closely resembles that of an intent to kill. We can't allow the gravity of this incident to be down-played simply because it was a non-human device that delivered the death blow. Nor can we allow the combatant's gross carnage to be used in justifying his murder, for this would exhibit extrajudicial prejudice of which has no place in our constitution. We have to adhere to the law for without it, chaos ensues. Remote-controlled lethality is no less a killing. And, is there video data from the drone? What if footage showed a civilian combatant with his hands in the air just before detonation? What if it showed a combatant in a wounded and semi-responsive state ? Would that be murder by proxy ? The Dallas Police Department has experienced devastating losses and it should be given some respect. But, while I'm not trying to beat a dead horse here, I can't help but feel like the old adage, "two wrongs don't make a right," applies.

I've heard the excuse, "times are changing and authorities have to keep-up with the bad guys." That's simply nonsense and any statistical inquiry will show that the "bad guys" are still primarily using the same weapons they've been using for the past Century --- blades, clubs, guns and explosives --- they're not running around nowadays with phasers, gravity-cannons and A-bombs or even fully automatic rifles, for that matter ! The fact is, authorities are creating such a disparity in capabilities between those in power and the common citizen that should there ever be an instance when the American people feel justified in exercising their constitutional rights to assemble, create militias and bear arms, it would be a totally fruitless endeavor, for they would be no match for those in power.

Many have warned of a day when heavy-handed tactics used on military battlefields would find application on the domestic streets of America. Well, my fellow Americans, we have just witnessed such an event. The UGV Drone has been unleashed with lethality, which sets precedent and opens the door for a day when unmanned UAV Aerial Drones are dropping their payloads above American soil.

What will these escalated tactics bring upon our society? They will not bring us a safer America, as you will be told by the talking-head pundits. No, it will bring more backlash, bloodshed and criminal innovation and improvisation.

The vicious cycle will never cease until authorities deescalate and allow time for the people to gain a restored faith that they are not being subjugated and assaulted by those appointed authorities who are supposed to be serving in their best interests.

4/30/2016

Weather Warfare

weather modification weather manipulation environmental modification cloud seeding ionosphere chemtrails

Down in South Texas we just experienced one of the mildest winters on record and through April, 2016 we experienced some of the costliest hail storms and flooding in State history. In my living area I've seen and sustained more hail damage in the past year than I have witnessed in the past 20 years, combined. This, along with other extreme weather reports being seen around the globe, got me thinking.

Global Warming. You hear and read about it all the time in the media. The media has historically focused on topics about CFC's (chlorofluorocarbons), ozone, the melting ice caps, polar bears and penguins, temperature data manipulation, rising sea levels, carbon footprints, greenhouse gasses, environmental politics, and the like. But, have you ever heard of Weather Modification, Weather Manipulation or Environmental Modification being spoken about in the mainstream media ?

The quest for harnessing the powers of mother nature have been upon us for nearly three quarters of a century. As early as the 1940's the US DoD and scientists have been working on this task. It is a known fact that the US, EU, Russia and China have the knowledge and technology to manipulate the weather.

In the late 1960's, Operation Popeye was an early example of this technology being used in warfare, whereby the US began to create (seed) an artificial monsoon season in the area comprised of the Ho Chi Minh Trail. The intended result was to bog down the North Vietnamese and Vietcong military supply chain that ran down to South Vietnam from the North while passing through bordering Laos and Cambodia. Though this campaign did not change the course of the war, the technology, in the scope of its application, showed promising results.

In 1977, the UN General Assembly imposed an international ban on the use of environmental modification techniques by militaries or hostile forces.

Early weather modification techniques, such as those used in Operation Popeye, involved Cloud Seeding, whereby precipitation could be induced by means of releasing chemical agents or materials into the atmosphere via aircraft. These techniques are still used today and may arise from sources in government, agricultural organizations, municipalities and hydroelectric utilities. Common material agents used in cloud seeding projects are silver iodide, dry ice, salts, liquid nitrogen, acetone and other adjuncts. This method of weather modification preceded the much more ominous and currently studied technique of utilizing Directed Energy or electromagnetic radiation in the Earth's atmosphere.

Beyond its orbit, 23 degree axial rotation and water, the Earth’s weather is greatly influenced by the Sun's Electromagnetic Radiation. Solar storms or flares can have pronounced effects upon planetary weather. The Earth's ionosphere acts as an outer shield, of sorts, that filters solar radiation reaching Earth. The ionosphere is the outer layer of Earth's atmosphere that comprises a zone that starts at around 30 miles up from the Earth's surface and extending several hundred miles outward. Manipulating this filtering zone presents the theoretical potential to modify Earth's weather patterns. According to Physicist Bernard Eastlund, whom holds a portfolio of patents, technology could possibly allow for weather changes to be brought about by manipulating the ionic charge density and plasma levels in the ionosphere through the use of land-based directed energy. In fact, the DoD's project HAARP appears very similar to Eastlund's patents. Looking forward, the potential of satellite-based weather modification technology may lay ahead though, there's no apparent documentation of its current application.

The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), under the DoD, is an offshoot of the Strategic Defense Initiative (aka, President Reagan's Star Wars program). Starting in the early 1990's, the aim of the project was to create an array of high powered antennae that would be capable of emitting massive levels of electromagnetic radiation that would be capable of heating the outer layer of the Earth's atmosphere (ionosphere). The formally provided purpose of the project was for communications and surveillance research. The capability of HAARP to manipulate and perturb the ionosphere leads some to speculate that the more feasible purpose of the technology is that of weather pattern manipulation. In 2014-2015 the HAARP project was halted along with the equipment being transferred to the University of Alaska. There are several other active ionospheric heater arrays strewn about the US and other nations. There's no concrete evidence that HAARP's capabilities were used in weather modification. Some scientists state that the power levels of HAARP are no match for the forces of nature. Scientists, like popular Physicist Dr. Michio Kaku, have talked on major television networks about Directed Energy-weather related experiments that sound potentially viable. These are studies that suggest directed energy can influence weather under certain preconditions, by the use of laser-induced plasma within cloud formations, in situ.

Whether or not advanced weather modification techniques exist beyond the conventional "seeding" methods, is a contested argument. One thing that's undeniable, is INTENT.

The following is quoted from the executive summary of a research paper, "Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025," produced by the United States Air Force for the Department of Defense (it should be noted that this is a forecast and not necessarily reality) :

"In 2025, US aerospace forces can "own the weather" by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.

A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.

Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future."

The highly respected climatologist, Alan Robock, is quoted as saying, "On January 19, 2011, I got a phone call from two men who told me they were consultants for the CIA. Roger Lueken and Michael Canes, analysts for the Logistics Management Institute, asked, among other things, “If another country were trying to control our climate, would we be able to detect it?” This raises a red flag and can be interpreted a couple ways. Verbatim, it suggests that one of the most sophisticated agencies in the world has "concerns" about Weather Modification. On the other hand, as noted by Robock, it could suggest an inverted question that is really asking an expert climatologist whether or not he would be able to detect weather manipulation being conducted by some “Agency.” In February 2015 the U.S. National Academies of Science released a two-volume report on geoengineering which calls for increased investment in countering climate change. The CIA was a major sponsor of this study.

Beyond such things as warfare and agricultural rainfall production, weather modification technology may hold grave global implications through potential abilities to destabilize economies, ecosystems and the agriculture of targeted adversaries. Targeted regions (or states) could, in turn, be forced into dependence on the purchase and import of commodities from the same entity, or allies thereof, that initiated the environmental attack. On the other hand, the potentially Earth-friendly, environmental benefits that weather modification technologies could possibly possess is unknown, but would undoubtedly be welcomed. But, for all intents and purposes, Weather Modification technology could be considered a Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Directed Energy usage for Weather Modification is not something that can be easily documented or protested. Because you cannot see, hear, smell, taste or even feel Directed Energy (in certain instances), it is very hard to identify and prove its usage. This is not unlike the experiences of some journalist, protesters, dissidents and other "Targeted Individuals" whom have been victimized by the use of Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs).

Despite what the state of the technology suggests, due to a fear of government backlash, you won't hear the terms, "ionospheric heating," "weather modification," or "environmental modification" being used in the debates on global warming. The topic is conveniently left out of mainstream media conversations about global warming. The majority of people (including journalists), unlike this author, are driven more by their fears than by truth and principles, so the end result becomes mass ignorance and environmental catastrophe.

References:

https://weather.com/news/news/san-antonio-texas-hailstorm-costliest-in-history

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, November 29, 2015
The Ecologist, December 2007, Global Research 7 December 2007

SEYMOUR M. HERSH
"Rainmaking Is Used As Weapon by U.S.; Cloud-Seeding in Indochina Is Said to Be Aimed at Hindering Troop Movements and Suppressing Antiaircraft Fire Rainmaking Used for Military Purposes by the U.S. in Indochina Since '63"
The New York Times
July 03, 1972

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program

Thomas Leisner, 10106–10110, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222190110
"Laser-induced plasma cloud interaction and ice multiplication under cirrus cloud conditions"
PNAS, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
vol. 110 no. 25

Alan Robock
"The CIA asked me about controlling the climate – this is why we should worry "
The Guardian
Tuesday 17 February 2015 11.35 EST

"Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025"
http://fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm

Dr. Michio Kaku talks "Climate Control" on CBS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0z7JOxQaO0

www.weathermodification.org/

2/24/2016

Principle Of Privacy

$phone encryption fight apple fbi fight for privacy surveillance corruption violation infraction crimes overreach infringement data integrity san bernardino shooting$

Government intelligence agencies continue their relentless pursuit of an omniscient bearing over its citizenry. This is evidentiary in the FBI's ongoing tussle with Apple corporation over the encrypted data contained within the phone of one of the deceased December, 2015 San Bernardino shooters.

As a shepherd of encryption, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (eff.org) points out that the attack on data integrity has been heated since the 1990's and all appearances show no end in sight.

The FBI's candid perspective on citizens private data can be seen in a report, "The Director" which CBS's 60 Minutes aired on Oct. 12, 2014, whereby the Director of the FBI was presented with a question concerning the privacy rights of individuals, and their ability to retain data within encrypted devices such as cell phones. His reply was, in effect, that it would be wrong to be able to retain data from the hands of law enforcement, using the analogy of whether it would be acceptable to society if a car's trunk was made so impenetrable that no one could get inside to observe its contents. This is a flawed perspective ; let me explain. Firstly, data stored in a cell phone is not a tangible entity such as that found in the contents of a car's trunk. Data is akin to memory as stored in one's mind. It could be considered a copy of one's thoughts as in the form of notes, ideas, or images. It is, in essence, intellectual property, not unlike one's thoughts or memories stowed away in the grey matter of your brain. So, No, you should not have access to data stored on an encrypted phone or device if the owner, thereof, does not want to divulge it. Regardless of how valuable or critical the information is, it should not be accessible without consent ! Do we allow the torture of suspects for the purpose of extracting data or knowledge they retain in their mind, even if someone else's life is hanging in the balance? No, we do not ! Data should be considered an extension of one's intellectual property and therefore be off-limits.

Law enforcement should conceive and concede to this common sense approach to individual rights and strive to enhance their gumshoe tactics in solving crimes, rather than pursuing the private domains of citizens.

The governments tool of choice to get what they want nowadays is the exploitation of tragedies and terrorism. They will use these instances to force a legal hand in their favor. Apple's decision to fight these demands is not merely based in principle, branding and image, but ultimately on self preservation, for should they bow to the FBI's demands, this precedence will open the gates for every other nation state, both good and bad, to make similar demands. And, with all of these State hands having access to their cookie jar, it would be impossible for Apple to mitigate the misuse of its concessions which would ultimately leave it's products devoid of integrity in the consumer world's eye. As a citizen and consumer, you lose as well. You lose privacy and potentially, a viable brand.

Data integrity is equally important to both business and the individual citizen. As individuals with a stake in these battles, full support for corporations like Apple should be a necessity based in principle, at a minimum. Voice your concerns to Washington. Visit sites like eff.org to explore more options for action.

.

2017 - U.S. State Department Says Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) Were Used To Attack Americans

.

Grooming In The Shadows

.

The Cycle of Harassment

In Retrospect . . .

Militarizing The Police

Weather Warfare

Principle Of Privacy

NOTICE :

Archives

Categories

Tag Cloud

home

about

contact

.

​2017 - U.S. State Department Says Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) Were Used To Attack Americans

.

Grooming In The Shadows

.

The Cycle of Harassment

In Retrospect . . .​

​Militarizing The Police

​Weather Warfare

Principle Of Privacy

NOTICE :

Archives

Categories

Tag Cloud

home﻿﻿﻿about﻿contact﻿

2017 - U.S. State Department Says Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) Were Used To Attack Americans

In Retrospect . . .

Militarizing The Police

Weather Warfare

home

about

contact